Ъъъ, не? Не беше. Тя Е някакъв там процент нейтив и причината за ДНК теста и ИЗОБЩО това да е тема за разговор, са расистките му атаки срещу нея, които не са от днес, вчера, или миналата година.The Dragon wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 8:28 pmНе си дал нито едно доказатвлство че е расизъм и не си се обосновал. Понякога трябват и аргументи. Не само да се запътваш към фейнтинг кауча. Пък и Тръмп беше прав за нея нали? В крайна сметка.
А по въпроса, който зададе:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/po ... 9c522d9752
Trump’s repeated reference to “Pocahontas” is racist first of all because it’s intended as a pejorative. Trump does not like Warren. It’s also racist because it seizes on a stereotypical Native American name to refer to an entire race — like calling an Asian man “Jackie Chan” or a black man “Frederick Douglass” (one of the president’s favorites). Worse yet, Trump is mushing together his tribes: At an event to honor Navajo heroes, he used the name of a Powhatan woman to disparage a senator who claimed Cherokee ancestry.
...
A better question than whether Warren is actually Native American is whether it matters in this debate — and it doesn’t. Warren could be all Cherokee, or 1/32nd Cherokee, or not Cherokee at all, and Trump would still be using the name of one Native American woman as a slur against all Native American people. The worst of Trump’s latest dust-up with Elizabeth Warren, in other words, has nothing to do with Elizabeth Warren at all.