Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:37 pm
Всъщност последните 5-6 епизода на анимационния сериал хич не са лоши.
Е, изгледах го цялото и правя евала на автора. Както се прави на олигофрен, така оформя една от най-конструктивните критики на новата трилогия - тук най-вече Епизод 1 - и съпоставка със старата и ми насочи вниманието върху подробности, които допълнително ме светнаха защо старата ми е толкова по-любима (не, не е заради възрастта при първото гледане). И защо дуелите и битките от старата трилогия са много по-смислени и адекватни от тези в новата - включително дуелът Вейдър-Бен Кеноби в Епизод 4, на който се смеят някои. И начинът на работа на Лукас при старата и новата трилогия.passer-by wrote:НАЙ, НАЙ, ама наистина НАЙ-КУЛТОВОТО РЕВЮ на Епизод 1, на което съм попадал!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI
И това го казвам само въз основа на първата му част (10 минути).
Чудесни съпоставки със старата трилогия, особено при описанието на персонажите, което е великолепно изведено, плюс неласкаво за чичо Джордж сравнение с други режисьори.
Затова и казах, че пичът нарочно се прави на олигофрен. А всъщност казва адски смислени неща. Абстрахирай се от гласа и обърни внимание на думите.Super M wrote:Аз лично опитах, но гласът на ревюиращия беше ужасно непоносим за изтънчения ми слух и сега се колебая дали бих издържал да го слушам толова дълго
Well, it might be true... from a certain point of view.VenomPlague wrote:@passer-by
За съпоставките със старите съм абсолютно съгласен, но в никакъв случай не бих казал, че Епизод 2 е в пъти по-зле от 1 както той твърди. На моменти малко дразни като прекали с иронията или лирическите отклонения, но в по-голямата си част казва истини, да.
Монтажът с Лея и Чубака накрая беше леко двусмислен.VenomPlague wrote:на тази кратка извадка изглежда гледаемо и забавно.
Whether or not there should be limits on a fictional world is a very real question for someone who intends to go line by line through a sci-fi film and explain why it’s terrible. RedLetterMedia writes, “It’s a balance between the established movie universe rules and what is just lazy screen writing. There’s a point when you can get too nit picky about stuff and I think there is a gradient of how picky you can get. Something like Star Trek is really black and white because there is this established universe and rules. It’s almost impossible for someone to write an airtight TNG feature given the established history. Something will always be wrong and there are a lot of things you have to write into a film in order to move the story along. You can’t evaluate all options that a trek character can take based on all the precedence that has come before it. So some things are forgivable and some are not. Star Wars is a little grayer because it’s a mix of fantasy and a lot of excuses can be made for things that are vague. Something like Lord of the Rings (if you ignore the details in the books and just look at them as movies) is pure fantasy and harder to nail down things that are wrong or contradictions. You also have to look at things from a screen writing perspective and have an understanding of movies too. What irks me more than any of that stuff is just sloppy writing. Stuff like weak character motivations, lapses in common sense and bad logic to advance the movie’s plot. The Star Wars prequels are the best examples of this where you’re mesmerized by all the visuals and excitement on screen, but if you really stop and listen you’ll realize that almost every line and every action makes no sense and is just there to get to the next special effects scene.”
Думи на redlettermedia от статията:The thing that really makes these film reviews shine is that you can tell RedLetterMedia is an enormous fan of Star Wars and Star Trek. The videos feature scenes cut from throughout the original Star Wars trilogy and the Star Trek series both for reference and to show examples of their quality in contrast. It’s not really about mocking these films or explaining why they suck. It’s a breakdown of how they could have been better. Qui-Gon Jin doesn’t really need to be in The Phantom Menace. Star Trek: Nemesis is a shameless rip-off of Wrath of Kahn except without the character development or drama. This is the kind of critical discussion that can only come about after the hype and excitement has died off. That’s when the conversation can quit being about “Loved it” or “Hated it” and start to explore what the work actually meant.
Оказва се, че сред феновете му са хора като Деймън Линделоф и Саймън Пег, които са дали в Туитър линкове към канала му в ЮТюб.People seemed to enjoy what I was doing so I kept doing it after that. I have never really been interested in movie reviewing in general just when it comes to movies that I have some kind of connection with. I can see a movie that’s just bad and shrug my shoulders. If it’s bad and it gets to me in some personal way I’ll have more interest in breaking down why it was bad and what went wrong rather than just complaining about how bad it is.
Статията е от 28 декември. Тоест ревюто на Епизод 1 е с близо 2 милиона гледания за по-малко от 3 седмици.Stoklasa's seven-part YouTube creation—absurdly long by Internet standards—has garnered close to 2 million views since its December 10 release, with fans spreading it rapidly across social media and blogs. Among the faithful is Lost co-creator Damon Lindelof, who posted the film on Twitter with the review: “Your life is about to change. This is astounding filmmaking. Watch ALL of it.”
Причина 29 по-точно.passer-by wrote: http://www.chefelf.com/starwars/ep2.php
(Да, допреди малко беше причина 20, ама свежите са толкова много... Няма място, та ще ги редувам в подписа си.)The entire scene just smacks of video game plot. Watching it you get the feeling that you are just playing a Sierra game from the late eighties. And it's everything, the layout of the set, the graphics, the plot and the dialogue. I spent most of the scene wishing that I had brought a mouse so that I could tell Obi-Wan to search for objects and look out the window.